Course: Association of an Advance Care Planning Video and Communication Intervention With Documentation of Advance Care Planning Among Older Adults: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial
CME Credits: 1.00
Released: 2022-02-24
Key Points
Question Can an advance care planning (ACP) video and communication intervention promote ACP for elderly patients during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic?Findings This pre-post, open-cohort nonrandomized controlled trial compared ACP documentation during three 6-month periods: pre–COVID-19 (14,107 patients), COVID-19 wave 1 (12,806 patients), and an intervention period (15,106 patients). The ACP documentation rates were 17.9% in the pre–COVID-19 period, 12.5% in the COVID-19 wave 1 period, and 23.7% in the intervention period; ACP rates during the intervention period were highest compared with the 2 other periods.
Meaning The use of an ACP video and communication intervention may promote ACP for elderly adults during the evolving COVID-19 pandemic.
Abstract
Importance COVID-19 has disproportionately killed older adults and racial and ethnic minority individuals, raising questions about the relevance of advance care planning (ACP) in this population. Video decision aids and communication skills training offer scalable delivery models.Objective To assess whether ACP video decision aids and a clinician communication intervention improved the rate of ACP documentation during an evolving pandemic, with a focus on African American and Hispanic patients.
Design, Setting, and Participants The Advance Care Planning: Communicating With Outpatients for Vital Informed Decisions trial was a pre-post, open-cohort nonrandomized controlled trial that compared ACP documentation across the baseline pre–COVID-19 period (September 15, 2019, to March 14, 2020), the COVID-19 wave 1 period (March 15, 2020, to September 14, 2020), and an intervention period (December 15, 2020, to June 14, 2021) at a New York metropolitan area ambulatory network of 22 clinics. All patients 65 years or older who had at least 1 clinic or telehealth visit during any of the 3 study periods were included.
Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was ACP documentation.
Results A total of 14,107 patients (mean [SD] age, 81.0 [8.4] years; 8856 [62.8%] female; and 2248 [15.9%] African American or Hispanic) interacted with clinicians during the pre–COVID-19 period; 12,806 (mean [SD] age, 81.2 [8.5] years; 8047 [62.8%] female; and 1992 [15.6%] African American or Hispanic), during wave 1; and 15,106 (mean [SD] 80.9 [8.3] years; 9543 [63.2%] female; and 2535 [16.8%] African American or Hispanic), during the intervention period. Clinicians documented ACP in 3587 patients (23.8%) during the intervention period compared with 2525 (17.9%) during the pre–COVID-19 period (rate difference [RD], 5.8%; 95% CI, 0.9%-7.9%; P?=?.01) and 1598 (12.5%) during wave 1 (RD, 11.3%; 95% CI, 6.3%-12.1%; P?<?.001). Advance care planning was documented in 447 African American patients (30.0%) during the intervention period compared with 233 (18.1%) during the pre–COVID-19 period (RD, 11.9%; 95% CI, 4.1%-15.9%; P?<?.001) and 130 (11.0%) during wave 1 (RD, 19.1%; 95% CI, 11.7%-21.2%; P?<?.001). Advance care planning was documented for 222 Hispanic patients (21.2%) during the intervention period compared with 127 (13.2%) during the pre–COVID-19 period (RD, 8.0%; 95% CI, 2.1%-10.9%; P?=?.004) and 82 (10.2%) during wave 1 (RD, 11.1%; 95% CI, 5.5%-14.5%; P?<?.001).
Conclusions and Relevance This intervention, implemented during the evolving COVID-19 pandemic, was associated with higher rates of ACP documentation, especially for African American and Hispanic patients.
Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
Educational Objective
To identify the key insights or developments described in this article
View Full Course